While the Coronavirus (COVID-19) was disrupting everyone’s lives, Palmer Lehman Sandberg worked to achieve a balance – continuing to take care of our clients’ legal needs, while protecting our clients, our employees, and our community (local and nationwide).

As Texas has begun to reopen, Palmer Lehman Sandberg has adjusted accordingly.

  • We are available for in-office meetings, with the following protections in place – while in our building and our office common areas (lobby, elevators, hallways, etc.), visitors must wear face coverings, and maintain social distancing (minimum 6’) as much as possible.
  • We continue telephone and video conferencing in place of face-to-face meetings, for those who prefer it.

As we continue to serve you, we wish everyone safety and good health as together we move forward through these uncertain times.

Please reach out to anyone at our firm via email or phone with any questions or concerns.

Email us
Star

Providing Solutions

Attorneys have differing opinions concerning pipeline dispute

| Feb 21, 2014 | Business Litigation |

The trial involving Energy Transfer Partners, Enterprise Products and Enbridge is not surprisingly receiving close scrutiny.  ETP claims that Enterprise ended its partnership concerning a pipeline project to pursue a relationship with Enbridge instead.

ETP claims that it legally formed a partnership with Enterprise in 2011 to create a pipeline that would transport oil into Texas.  Enterprise and Enbridge claim no such arrangement ever existed.

Though the litigation is about the possible creation of a business concern, the parties appeared to take this matter very personally.  The attorney for ETP claims his client was a victim of cheating.  “”They kicked us out like we were dogs,” he told the jury.

On the other hand, the attorney for Enterprise stated there was no exclusivity concerning the pipeline and that ETP was “trying to create a partnership through ambush.”  And the Enbridge lawyer stated: “It’s not a marriage.  They will never love each other.”  The parties are sifting through evidence to demonstrate whether there was a joint venture between ETP and Enterprise.

What is significant is the amount of damages claimed.  ETP’s attorney stated his client lost between $594 million and $1.3 billion.  This attorney was also seeking punitive damages.  The Enterprise lawyer countered that ETP only had $35,000 in out-of-pocket expenses while Enterprise had spent $1.7 million.

There is much more to these business dispute claims than this and that’s why experienced business attorneys need to be involved.  These disputes revolve around definitions of what a partnership or joint venture could be, contract language and possible loss of business opportunity.  In any case, the amount at stake in such disputes means these matters need to be handled professionally.

Source: Dallas News, “Billion-dollar pipeline trial taking shape as a nasty divorce case,” Mark Curriden, Feb. 2, 2014