While the Coronavirus (COVID-19) was disrupting everyone’s lives, Palmer Lehman Sandberg worked to achieve a balance – continuing to take care of our clients’ legal needs, while protecting our clients, our employees, and our community (local and nationwide).

As Texas has begun to reopen, Palmer Lehman Sandberg has adjusted accordingly.

  • We are available for in-office meetings, with the following protections in place – while in our building and our office common areas (lobby, elevators, hallways, etc.), visitors must wear face coverings, and maintain social distancing (minimum 6’) as much as possible.
  • We continue telephone and video conferencing in place of face-to-face meetings, for those who prefer it.

As we continue to serve you, we wish everyone safety and good health as together we move forward through these uncertain times.

Please reach out to anyone at our firm via email or phone with any questions or concerns.

Email us

Providing Solutions

How do courts handle interstate child custody disputes? P.2

| May 8, 2015 | Child Custody |

In our last post, we began speaking about the important issue of interstate child custody litigation, and how Texas courts determine where these disputes are handled. The issue is an important one, given that different states have different approaches to child custody and custody disputes can turn out differently depending on where a couple’s case is handled. As we mentioned, the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) provides the primary guidance for courts in these cases.

One point about which Texas case law is clear is that the intention of a parent to make a location the child’s home state is not the most important factor in determining which state in which a child custody matter is litigated. Obviously, it could be quite difficult for courts to make a determination of jurisdiction on that basis. Because of this, the most important factor is the state where the child actually, physically lived for the six months prior to the litigation was initiated. 

While actually, physical presence may sound like a fairly straightforward determination to make, it isn’t always so. In fact, one of the most common issues in child custody jurisdiction appeals involves the question of where the child was actually living at the time divorce is filed. This issue often comes up in cases where the child is living with both parents part-time in different states. As one can imagine, this scenario would be more common along state borders.

With respect to modification of a child custody order, Texas’ version of the UCCJEA has it that Texas has sole jurisdiction over a case which was initially filed in Texas unless the child and a parent or guardian do not have a strong enough connection with Texas to support jurisdiction. Disputes on this point can also arise.

These, of course, are only a couple of the areas where litigation can happen with interstate child custody disputes. The long and short of it is that navigating interstate child custody disputes can be a complicated matter, both from a legal perspective and from an emotional perspective. Having the assistance of an experienced attorney is critical to ensuring that one has the guidance and advocacy necessary for effectively handling a custody dispute.

FindLaw Network